![]() So it is that the animals live in the forest, white men sit about reading a lot, and black men work hard and have control of fire. : RyounoArt 3 Piece Monkey Canvas Wall Art Black Gorilla Portrait Painting Pictures Ape Chimpanzee Animal Prints Artwork for Living Room Bedroom. The white man said that he had read the book, and God said that the white man would continue to do that, that the white man would know many things but would need the black man to care for him because the white man knew nothing about keeping warm and growing food. Zambe turned to the white man and asked him what he had done with the gifts. Select from 769 premium Black And White Gorilla of the highest. Zambe told him that he would continue to do that, he would have to spend his life working hard for others because he lacked book knowledge. Find Black And White Gorilla stock photos and editorial news pictures from Getty Images. The black man replied that he had not had time to read it because he was tending the fire. Then Zambe asked the black man where his book was. When Chimpanzee and Gorilla said what they had done, Zambe condemned them: they would have hairy bodies, big teeth, and live forever in the forest, eating fruit. When the creator came for a visit, he called his creatures together and asked what they had done with the things he had given them. The black man stirred the fire, not bothering about the book. ![]() Gorilla followed, and Elephant stood around. Chimpanzee left the fire and the other gifts, and went into the forest to eat the fruit there. When smoke got in the white man's eyes, he went away with the book. Zambe gave his new creations water, tools, fire, the book. One of the men he created was black, another was white. Flickr’s response was much the same as Google’s: the company apparently removed the word “ape” from its tagging lexicon entirely.Zambe, the son of Membe'e, the one who supports the world, was sent to create man, the chimpanzee, elephant, and gorilla, each of whom he named after himself. The Yahoo-owned photo sharing platform labelled a picture of a black man as “ape”, and a photo of the Dachau concentration camp as “jungle gym”. At the same time that product was launched, Flickr released a similar feature, auto-tagging – which had an almost identical set of problems. That is particularly true of the first wave of image-recognition systems, of which Google Photos was a part. Such technologies are frequently described as a “black box”, capable of producing powerful results, but with little ability on the part of their creators to understand exactly how and why they make the decisions they do. ![]() The failure of the company to develop a more sustainable fix in the following two years highlights the extent to which machine learning technology, which underpins the image recognition feature, is still maturing. But Google Assistant will correctly identify the primates, as will Google’s business-to-business image recognition service Google Cloud Vision. The gorilla blindness is found in other places across Google’s platform: Google Lens, a camera app that identifies objects in images, will also refuse to recognise gorillas. Google confirmed that the terms were removed from searches and image tags as a direct result of the 2015 incident, telling the magazine that: “Image labelling technology is still early and unfortunately it’s nowhere near perfect”. Photos accurately tagged images of pandas and poodles, but consistently returned no results for the great apes and monkeys – despite accurately finding baboons, gibbons and orangutans. That’s the conclusion drawn by Wired magazine, which tested more than 40,000 images of animals on the service. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |